Search for: "Johnson v. Goldberg et al"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 3:02 am
” [Phil Goldberg, Forbes] Study of contingent fee litigation in New York City: few cases resolved on dispositive motions, lawyers nearly always take the maximum one-third permitted by law [Eric Helland et al., forthcoming Vanderbilt Law Review/SSRN] Tags: asbestos, Canada, contingent fee, NYC, Richard Epstein, social media, terrorism Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).Batker, David, et al. [read post]
